Predestination v. Free Will

I was asked to write an article dealing with the issue of predestination and free will. The following are my thoughts about this issue:

Predestination v. Free Will. The latter has been one of the biggest arguments and one of the reasons that churches will split. This article is written to merely present an opinion and challenge you, the reader, to take a deeper look at scripture and wrestle with it. There is evidence for both predestination and free will in scripture, therefore, neither one can simply be dismissed. There are many evidences of both of these in scripture and we must therefore wrestle with these scriptures and accept that both of these issues have scriptural credibility.
Comparing these issues is very similar to the comparison of the human and divine nature of Jesus. Both of these natures are found to be in Christ and there are evidences of both of these in scripture. The term that is used to describe the acceptance of the human and divine nature of Christ is “Hypostatic union,” which means that the two natures are united in one person. Similarly, both predestination and free will exist and have scriptural evidence.
These issues cause us so many problems mainly because we are incapable of wrapping our minds around the fact that both can exist in unison. In the book of Deuteronomy there is a discussion about the knowledge of God, and in the New Testament there is discussion about the mysteries of God that man will never know. The issue of predestination and free will is one of those things that is never going to make sense in our minds. Below is a diagram that can help to explain is. Basically, both predestination and free will go towards this line of knowledge and above that line is the knowledge of God that we will never know. Furthermore, above this line it is unknown to us what happens to these two views, do they intersect/overlap, or do the simply continue on their own? This again is something we will not know.
Both of these views fall under the title of systematic theology and should be treated as and discussed with care and with humility. The one thing about systematic theology is that it relies on a system and that scripture ‘fits’ into that and any scripture against it is explained away. I challenge anyone reading this to take the standpoint of what one might call a “Biblicist.” By this I simply mean that you would search the Bible and believe what the scriptures say about each point/issue.
Remember that in the discussion of any issue it is never good for either party to become frustrated or angry. Discussion is good but arguments can be harmful. Remain humble in everything that you do and in all that you do, do it with love.